Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Kidd v. Cash Lane Texas, LLC
as 1:2026cv02059
Plaintiff:
Scott V Kidd
Defendant:
Cash Lane Texas, LLC
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1441 (a) Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01865
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Clarkson v. City of Orem et al
as 2:2026cv00682
Plaintiff:
Danny Clarkson
Defendant:
City of Orem, Orem Police Department, Brody Bowen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Blake v. Jones
as 4:2026cv01150
Plaintiff:
Byron E. Blake, Jr.
Defendant:
Cash Jones doing business as Wack 100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Cole #371593 v. DeRose et al
as 2:2026cv05032
Plaintiff:
John Anthony Cole
Defendant:
Unknown DeRose, Unknown Munoz, Martin Pong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arkansas Gravel Co., Inc. v. V M I Inc. et al
as 1:2026cv01041
Plaintiff:
Arkansas Gravel Co., Inc.
Defendant:
V M I Inc. and Cassius "Cash" Maitlen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Sacramento Homeless Union, et al v. City of Sacramento, et al.,
as 2:2026cv02473
Plaintiff:
Sacramento Homeless Union, Antwonn Brooks, Amber Criswell-Tippins and others
Defendant:
City of Sacramento, Brian Pedro, Step Up on Second Street, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Terrance Johnson, II v. Nicolas Estes
as 26-6763
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE JOHNSON, II
Defendant:
NICOLAS ESTES, ANTHONY CASH and TYREE DAVIS
The Bank of New York Mellon v. Oden et al
as 1:2026cv00073
Plaintiff:
The Bank of New York Mellon and The Bank of New York
Defendant:
Ketura Oden, Ascend Federal Credit Union, Cash City 102 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2410 Quiet Title
Shakeyra Bradley v. Cash App Investing, Block Inc., et al
as 26-12429
Plaintiff:
SHAKEYRA K. BRADLEY
Defendant:
CASH APP INVESTING, BLOCK INC., DRIVE WEALTH, SQUARE INC. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.