Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Anderson v. Law Firm of Shorty, Dooley & Hall et al
as 2:2009cv04160
Plaintiff:
Antoinette Anderson
Defendant:
Law Firm of Shorty, Dooley & Hall, Michael J. Hall, Entergy Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Antoinette Turner v. Herbert Cade, et al
as 09-30469
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTOINETTE A TURNER
Defendant - Appellee:
HERBERT A CADE, Honorable, Personally and In His Capacity as Judge in the Civil District Court, LAW OFFICE OF GREGORY P. DILEO, GREGORY P DILEO, Personally and In Capacity as Staff Attorney for the Law Office of Gregory P. DiLeo and others
Antoinette Turner v. Herbert Cade, et al
as 09-30332
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTOINETTE A TURNER
Defendant - Appellee:
HERBERT A CADE, Honorable, personally and in his capacity as judge in the Civil District Court, LAW OFFICE OF GREGORY P. DILEO, GREGORY P DILEO, personally and in capacity as staff attorney for the Law Office of Gregory P. DiLeo and others
Turner v. Lee County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2009cv00106
Plaintiff:
William P. Turner
Defendant:
Lee County Sheriff's Department, Jim H. Johnson, Joel Royce and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Turner v. Chase, et al
as 08-31180
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTOINETTE A TURNER
Defendant - Appellee:
TIFFANY G CHASE, Personally and in her Capacity as Judge, LAW FIRM OF SHORTY, DOOLEY AND HALL, MICHAEL J HALL, Personally and in His Capacity as Staff Attorney for Law Firm of Shorty, Dooley, and Hall and others
Turner v. Cade et al
as 2:2008cv04951
Plaintiff:
Antoinette A. Turner
Defendant:
Herbert A Cade, Law Office of Gregory P. DiLeo, Gregory P. DiLeo and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Turner v. Chase et al
as 2:2008cv03884
Plaintiff:
Antoinette A. Turner
Defendant:
Tiffany G. Chase, Law Firm of Shorty, Dooley & Hall, Michael J. Hall and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
