Cases 1 - 10 of 23
SWEET STREET DESSERTS INC. v. BUNZL USA HOLDINGS, LLC et al
as 5:2021cv03187
Plaintiff:
. SWEET STREET DESSERTS INC.
Defendant:
BUNZL USA HOLDINGS, LLC and PACTIV, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SWEET STREET DESSERTS INC. v. BUNZL USA HOLDINGS, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv03187
Plaintiff:
. SWEET STREET DESSERTS INC.
Defendant:
BUNZL USA HOLDINGS, LLC and PACTIV, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00841
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
AIG Austrailia Limuited, as subrogee of Rank Group Limited v. Arka Express Inc
as 1:2020cv04981
Defendant:
ARKA EXPRESS INC
Plaintiff:
AIG AUSTRAILIA LIMITED, as subrogee of RANK GROUP LIMITED d/b/a PACTIV LLC USA and AIG Austrailia Limited as Subrogee of Rank Group Limited doing business as PACTIV LLC USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv01691
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03031
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pactiv LLC v. Perez
as 1:2020cv01296
Defendant:
Michael Perez
Plaintiff:
Pactiv LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hendrix v. Pactiv LLC,
as 6:2019cv06419
Plaintiff:
Walter J. Hendrix
Defendant:
Pactiv LLC,
Consolidated Defendant:
Masis Staffing Solutions, LLC, Alan Bellis, Larissa Willis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01495
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hazelwood v. S Service, LLC et al
as 3:2019cv00105
Defendant:
S Service, LLC, Reynolds Consumer Products, LLC, PACTIV, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Keith Hazelwood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
