Cases 1 - 10 of 54
Sanchez v. Shinn, et al.
as 25-1791
Plaintiff:
JAMES A SANCHEZ
Defendant:
DAVID SHINN, Director, in his official and individual capacity, UNKNOWN O'BRIEN, Captain, in his official and individual capacity, TOM DOLAN, Centurion, in his official and individual capacity and others
Shawn Goff v. Trinity Services Group, et al
as 23-15929
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHAWN CHARLES GOFF
Defendant / Appellee:
TRINITY SERVICES GROUP, KEEFE COMMISSARY NETWORK LLC, THOMPSON, Unknown ; Warden and others
COX v. MASON et al
as 4:2022cv01824
Plaintiff:
Michael Cox
Defendant:
Bernadette Mason, Wellpath, Correct Care Solution(s) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanchez #061919 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2022cv01806
Plaintiff:
James A Sanchez
Defendant:
David Shinn, J Mattos, Unknown Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COX v. MASON et al
as 2:2022cv03984
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL COX
Defendant:
FACILITY MANAGER BERNADETTE MASON, WELLPATH, CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shawn Goff v. Trinity Services Group, et al
as 22-15564
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHAWN CHARLES GOFF
Defendant / Appellee:
TRINITY SERVICES GROUP, KEEFE COMMISSARY NETWORK LLC, THOMPSON, Warden and others
Mcclure v. Smith et al
as 1:2022cv00419
Plaintiff:
Matthew S. Mcclure
Defendant:
Pam Smith, Dr. Taylor, B. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Blowe v. Miller et al
as 3:2022cv00189
Plaintiff:
Ronald Blowe
Defendant:
Miller, Taylor, Ms. Jones Block and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Taylor et al
as 2:2021cv00509
Plaintiff:
Calvin Eugene Clark, Jr.
Defendant:
Mr. Taylor, Miss Jones and Mrs. Pam Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Atkins v. Bullock et al
as 1:2021cv00943
Plaintiff:
John Atkins
Defendant:
Nurse Bullock, Nurse Jones, Pam Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
