Cases
Whalen, et al. v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California, San Francisco
as 24-2086
Petitioner: CHRISTINE WHALEN, KATHERINE ARCELL, JOSE BRITO and others
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO
Interested Party: ALBERTSONS COMPANIES, INC., CERBERUS CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LP and THE KROGER CO.
Whalen et al v. Albertsons Companies Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00459
Plaintiff: Christine Whalen, Katherine Arcell, Jose Brito and others
Defendant: Albertsons Companies Inc., Kroger Co. and Cerberus Capital Management L.P.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Keith Bradt, et al v. T-Mobile US, Inc., et al
as 20-15392
Defendant / Appellee: SOFTBANK GROUP CORP., T-MOBILE US, INC., SPRINT CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: DEBORAH M. PULFER, PAM WARD, BILL RUBINSOHN and others
Keith Dean Bradt et al v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2019cv07752
Plaintiff: CLYDE STENSRUD, BRENDA DAVIS, DIANE ULTICAN and others
Defendant: T-Mobile US, Inc., SoftBank Group Corp., Sprint Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
Padgett v. Byerly et al
as 6:2016cv00798
Defendant: Captain Alvis, Sgt. Arnoux, T. Bailey and others
Plaintiff: Vincent Padgett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Signode Industrial Group, LLC v. Ward et al
as 1:2016cv04655
Plaintiff: Signode Industrial Group, LLC
Defendant: Pam Ward , Royce Williams , Sam Alexander and others
Counter_claimant: Pam Ward and Toby Clark
Counter_defendant: Signode Industrial Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ward v. Actavis Totowa, LLC et al
as 2:2010cv00300
Plaintiff: Pam Ward
Defendant: Actavis Totowa, LLC, Actavis Inc., Actavis Elizabeth, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?