Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Holt v. Staley et al
as 3:2021cv00051
Defendant:
John Staley, J Gibson, D Berryman and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Alton Holt, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv02918
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 19-80106
Not Yet Classified:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Manuel v. Soon-Shiong et al
as 1:2018cv01857
Defendant:
Patrick Soon-Shiong, Kirk K. Calhoun, Mark Burnett and others
Plaintiff:
Louis Manuel
Nominal Defendant:
NantHealth, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kusumam Koshy v. Craig Barbarosh, et al
as 18-56159
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KUSUMAM KOSHY, derivatively on behalf of nominal defendant Quality Systems, Inc.
Defendant / Appellee:
CRAIG A. BARBAROSH, GEORGE H. BRISTOL, JAMES C. MALONE and others
Kusumam Koshy v. Craig Barbarosh, et al
as 18-56159
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KUSUMAM KOSHY, derivatively on behalf of nominal defendant Quality Systems, Inc.
Defendant - Appellee:
CRAIG A. BARBAROSH, GEORGE H. BRISTOL, JAMES C. MALONE and others
HOLT v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE et al
as 1:2018cv01910
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE, JOHN DOE and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA PAUL HILTON HOLT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holt v. Sullivan
as 3:2018cv00568
Plaintiff:
Joshua Paul Hilton Holt
Defendant:
Meggan B. Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holt v. Cordle et al
as 3:2018cv00567
Plaintiff:
Joshua Paul Hilton Holt
Defendant:
Michael Cordle, Bonnie Harris and Mount Juliet Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holt v. Wilson County, Tennessee, et al.
as 3:2018cv00548
Plaintiff:
Joshua Paul Hilton Holt
Defendant:
Wilson County Tennessee, Wilson County General Sessions Court, Wilson County, Tennessee Court Reporters Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
