Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Jackson et al v. Page et al
as 5:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Paul Jackson and Jessica Jackson
Defendant:
Sgt Noah Page, Destin Owens, Calloway County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dealer Trade Network Holdco, LLC v. Lynch et al
as 3:2023cv00411
Plaintiff:
Dealer Trade Network Holdco, LLC doing business as Dealer Trade Network
Defendant:
Paul T. Lynch, Paul Jackson, Taylor Leonard and others
Dowell v. Kent et al
as 1:2022cv01009
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Dowell
Defendant:
FNU Kent, FNU Bo, Mark Fowler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv02629
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Paul Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jackson #146503 et al v. McPherson et al
as 1:2017cv00965
Plaintiff:
Paul Jackson #146503, Patrick McPherson, Norman Kuhn and others
Defendant:
Matt Swab, Joel Johnson, Billy Windom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Artis et al v. Ingham, County of et al
as 1:2017cv00516
Plaintiff:
Geordan Artis, Dymarion Jackson, James Dalton and others
Defendant:
Ingham County Jail, Scott Wriggelsworth, Unknown Gaston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Ingham County Jail et al
as 1:2017cv00463
Plaintiff:
Paul Jackson
Defendant:
Ingham County Jail and Scott Wigglesworth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson et al v. Ingham County Jail et al
as 2:2017cv10777
Plaintiff:
Paul Jackson, Lorenzo Chestner and Keith Medlin
Defendant:
Ingham County Jail, Ingham County Sheriff Dept., Scott Wigglesworth and others
Jackson v. USA
as 1:2016cv12014
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Joseph Paul Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01166
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
