Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Ryan Singh v. John Wetzel, et al
as 22-1775
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RYAN PAUL SINGH
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN E. WETZEL, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections
Singh v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al
as 5:2021cv01809
Respondent:
PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE, Nassir Singh, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Petitioner:
Ryan Paul Singh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Singh v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al
as 4:2021cv00536
Respondent:
Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office, Nassir Singh, Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania and others
Petitioner:
Ryan Paul Singh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Singh v. Wetzel et al
as 4:2021cv00200
Defendant:
John Wetzel, C.O. Lowe, Shirley Moore Smeal and others
Plaintiff:
Ryan Paul Singh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stephenson Awah Teneng et al v. Donald J. Trump et al
as 5:2018cv01609
Plaintiff:
Atinder Paul Singh, Gurjinder Singh, Noe Mauricio Granados Aquino and others
Defendant:
Kirstjen M. Nielsen, David Marin, Ronald D. Vitiello and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Singh v. Kauffman
as 5:2018cv02539
Petitioner:
Ryan Paul Singh
Respondent:
KEVIN KAUFFMAN and PA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Singh v. Kauffman
as 4:2018cv01171
Petitioner:
Ryan Paul Singh
Respondent:
Kevin Kauffman and PA Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Singh v. Kauffman
as 4:2018cv00717
Plaintiff:
Ryan Paul Singh
Defendant:
Kevin Kauffman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parthemore v. Toor et.al.
as 1:2014cv00307
Plaintiff:
Ira D. Parthemore
Defendant:
Kiran Deep Singh Toor, Nagabhushana Siddappa Malakkla, Paul Singh Virk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parthemore v. Toor et.al.
as 4:2014cv00456
Plaintiff:
Ira D. Parthemore
Defendant:
Kiran Deep Singh Toor, Nagabhushana Siddappa Malakkla, Paul Singh Virk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
