Cases 51 - 60 of 79
Earl Venton Buchanan v. Ronald J. Baker et al
as 5:2011cv00418
Defendant:
Ronald J Baker, Tambra Smith Childers, Bob W Sanders and others
Plaintiff:
Earl Venton Buchanan
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00159
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
William v. Ocean Cape LLC et al
as 2:2010cv01936
Plaintiff:
Paul William
Defendant:
Ocean Cape LLC and Dave Olney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Paul Driggers v. USDC-IDB
as 10-73410
:
In re: PAUL WILLIAM DRIGGERS
Petitioner:
PAUL WILLIAM DRIGGERS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO, BOISE
Real Party In Interest:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Paul Driggers v. Louis Winn, et al
as 10-16817
Appellant:
PAUL WILLIAM DRIGGERS
Defendant - Appellee:
LOUIS WINN, Warden and UNKOWN PARTIES, John Doe I, John Doe II, Unknown Employees of the U.S. Bureau of Prisons
George et al v. City of Tacoma, et al
as 3:2010cv05556
Plaintiff:
Paul William George
Defendant:
City of Tacoma , Dennis Quilio and Jane Doe Quilio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paul Driggers v. USA, et al
as 10-16222
Petitioner - Appellant:
PAUL WILLIAM DRIGGERS
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS and LOUIS WINN, Warden
Driggers et al v. Beck et al
as 1:2010cv00182
Defendant:
David Beck, Christina McNutt, Robin Jacobsen and others
Plaintiff:
Paul William Driggers, Desarae J Driggers, Csarena M Driggers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Horel et al
as 3:2009cv05314
Plaintiff:
Michael Paul Williams
Defendant:
Robert A. Horel, M. A. Cook, Dayton N. Conover and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Driggers v. USA
as 2:2009cv00468
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Paul William Driggers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
