Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Rudnick v. NH Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv00085
Petitioner:
Michael Rudnick
Respondent:
NH Department of Corrections, NH Department of Corrections, Commissioner, Paula Mattis and others
Other:
NH Department of Corrections - Notice Only - Habeas (Court Use Only) and NH Attorney General - Notice Only - Habeas (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Stow v. NH Department of Corrections, Commissioner et al
as 1:2023fp00455
Plaintiff:
Weston J. Stow
Defendant:
NH Department of Corrections, Commissioner, Lynn-Marie Cusack, Paula Mattis and others
Not Classified By Court:
NH Department of Corrections - Notice Only - Civil (Court Use Only) and NH Attorney General - Notice Only - Civil (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jordan v. NH Department of Corrections, Commissioner et al
as 1:2023fp00307
Plaintiff:
Michael Jordan
Defendant:
NH Department of Corrections, Commissioner, NH State Prison for Men, Warden, Paula Mattis and others
Not Classified By Court:
NH Department of Corrections - Notice Only - Civil (Court Use Only) and NH Attorney General - Notice Only - Civil (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kidd v. Mattis et al
as 1:2022cv00562
Plaintiff:
Kerry W. Kidd
Defendant:
Paula Mattis, Thomas Groblewski, Cherie Ertna and others
Not Classified By Court:
NH Attorney General - Notice Only - Civil (Court Use Only) and NH Department of Corrections - Notice Only - Civil (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gray v. Bergstedt, et al
as 22-1777
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFREY MARTIN GRAY
Defendant / Appellee:
INGJERD BERGSTEDT and DAVID ANZEL
Defendant:
PAUL LEVY, JOHN PERKINS, WILLIAM L. WRENN, Former Commissioner, NH Department of Corrections and others
Martinko v. NH Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2022fp00238
Plaintiff:
David M. Martinko
Defendant:
NH Department of Corrections, NH Department of Corrections, Commissioner, NH State Prison, Warden and others
Not Classified By Court:
NH Attorney General - Notice Only - Civil (Court Use Only) and NH Department of Corrections - Notice Only - Civil (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Czekalski v. Wrenn, et al
as 22-1328
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JASON A. CZEKALSKI
Defendant / Appellee:
HELEN HANKS, Commissioner, NH Department of Corrections, in both her individual and official capacities, CHRISTOPHER H. KENCH, Director of Security, NH Department of Corrections, in both his individual and official capacities, PAULA MATTIS, Director of Forensics Services, NH Department of Corrections, in both her individual and official capacities and others
Interested Party:
JOHN M. FORMELLA, NH Attorney General and NH DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Roy v. Hanks, et al
as 22-1302
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEVEN J. ROY
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL CHENEY, KEVIN LAURENT, MATTHEW L. TSOPAS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
HELEN HANKS, Commissioner, NH Department of Corrections, in both her official and individual capacity, PAULA MATTIS, BERNADETTE M. CAMPBELL and others
Perfetto v. NH Department of Corrections, Director et al
as 1:2022cv00128
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Andrew Perfetto and Jonathan Andrew Klein Rabinowitz-Perfetto
Defendant:
NH Department of Corrections, Director, Paula Mattis, Christopher H. Kench and others
Not Classified By Court:
NH Department of Corrections - Notice Only - Civil (Court Use Only) and NH Attorney General - Notice Only - Civil (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lamy v. NH Department of Corrections, Commissioner et al
as 1:2021cv00229
Defendant:
NH Department of Corrections, Commissioner, Paula Mattis, Jennifer Parent and others
Not Classified By Court:
NH Attorney General - Notice Only - Civil (Court Use Only) and NH Department of Corrections - Notice Only - Civil (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
Joshua W. Lamy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
