Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Davis v. AFAM Concept, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv06649
Plaintiff:
Pauline Davis
Defendant:
AFAM Concept, Inc. doing business as JF Labs, Inc., Avlon Industries, Godrej SON Holdings, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DAVIS v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as PAE/2:16-cv-04358
Plaintiff:
PAULINE DAVIS
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT, L.L.C.
DAVIS v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 2:2016cv04358
Plaintiff:
PAULINE DAVIS
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. Skechers, U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00008
Plaintiff:
Pauline Davis
Defendant:
Skechers, U.S.A., Inc., Skechers, U.S.A., Inc. II and Skechers Fitness Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gabrielle Alberici et al v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2012cv10511
Plaintiff:
G. A., J. A., Gabrielle Alberici and others
Defendant:
Guadalupe Arteaga, Priscilla Ashburn, County of Los Angeles and others
Gabrielle Alberici et al v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2012cv06841
Plaintiff:
G. A., J. A., Gabrielle Alberici and others
Defendant:
Guadalupe Arteaga, Priscilla Ashburn, Steven R. Callahan and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv06793
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00528
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00071
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BATES et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2009cv00305
Plaintiff:
ALBERTA BATES, LAKISHA RICHARDSON, BETTY LEONARD and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and MICHELLE RHEE
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
