Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Bronx Harbor Health Care Complex, Inc. v. McDonald
as 26-240
Plaintiff:
BRONX HARBOR HEALTH CARE COMPLEX, INC., ABRAHAM OPERATIONS ASSOCIATES LLC, AURNC OPERATING, LLC and others
Defendant:
M.D., M.P.H. JAMES V. MCDONALD, Commissioner of Health of the State of New York, or his predecessor or successor in office
Bronx Harbor Health Care Complex, Inc. v. McDonald
as 26-84
Plaintiff:
BRONX HARBOR HEALTH CARE COMPLEX, INC., ABRAHAM OPERATIONS ASSOCIATES LLC, AURNC OPERATING, LLC and others
Defendant:
M.D., M.P.H. JAMES V. MCDONALD, Commissioner of Health of the State of New York, or his predecessor or successor in office
Bronx Harbor Health Care Complex, Inc. et al v. McDonald
as 1:2024cv01573
Plaintiff:
DOJ Operations Associates LLC doing business as Triboro Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing, EDRNC Operating, LLC doing business as Eden Rehabilitation & Nursing Center, Conesus Lake Nursing Home, LLC and others
Defendant:
M.D., M.P.H. James V. McDonald
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396 - Tort Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv05296
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
connectRN, Inc. v. Bedrock Care, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv12388
Defendant:
Bedrock Care, LLC, Yeadon Operations, LLC, York Operating, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
connectRN, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02492
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
MILLENNIUM PHARMACY SYSTEMS, LLC v. MAPA OPERATING, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv02428
Defendant:
MAPA MANAGEMENT COMPANY, LLC, CLIVEDEN OPERATING, LLC, TUCKER OPERATING, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MILLENNIUM PHARMACY SYSTEMS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
