Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Strickland v. Kinkennon et al
as 1:2021cv00088
Plaintiff:
Sharon Strickland
Defendant:
Paxton Media Group, LLC, John Does 1-10 and Jamime M. Kinkennon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Brown v. Perry et al
as 3:2019cv00544
Plaintiff:
Herman Brown
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Dr. Gloria Perry, Paxton Paige and Unknown Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Knight v. Shults et al
as 3:2018cv00034
Plaintiff:
Prince Knight
Defendant:
L. Shults, Z. Lee and J. Paxton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Knight v. Shults et al
as 3:2017cv00831
Plaintiff:
Prince Knight
Defendant:
L. Shults, Z. Lee and J. Paxton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
McCray v. Mississippi Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2017cv00115
Plaintiff:
Otis Oliver McCray
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Corrections, Paxton Paige, H. Williamson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips v. Quality Choice Correctional Health Care et al
as 3:2015cv00412
Plaintiff:
Merritt Paxton Phillips
Defendant:
Quality Choice Correctional Health Care , Hinds County, Mississippi and John and Jane Does 1-100
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paxton Sales, Inc. v. Vogue Furniture Direct, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv00025
Plaintiff:
Paxton Sales, Inc.
Defendant:
Vogue Furniture Direct, Inc., Guozhi Qiao and Charimeng Furniture Co., Ltd
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Fulford v. Perry et al
as 3:2014cv00903
Plaintiff:
Corry Fulford
Defendant:
Gloria Perry, Wilson Parry, Paxton Paige and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chandler v. Epps et al
as 3:2014cv00603
Plaintiff:
Melvin N. Chandler
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Gloria Perry, Kimberly Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Knight v. Perry et al
as 3:2013cv00258
Plaintiff:
Curtis D. Knight
Defendant:
Gloria Perry, Eliza Warner, Louis Saddler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
