Cases 1 - 10 of 42
CUSH-EL v. STATE OF MISSOURI INC. et al
as 1:2021cv00337
Defendant:
AGENT MICHAEL L. PARSON, AGENT JOHN MARINER KEMPER, STATE OF MISSOURI INC. and others
Plaintiff:
PEACE ELLUVASUN ALLAH CUSH-EL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Peace v. Saul
as 4:2020cv00161
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Angela Peace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
PEACE v. USA
as 1:2019cv00745
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
BOBBY DEMOND PEACE, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Carter v. Ford et al
as 5:2018cv00180
Plaintiff:
Danielle A. Carter
Defendant:
Dioniso Ford, Sr., Dioniso Ford, Jr., Patricia Ford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hurt v. U.S. Constitution et al
as 5:2017mc00029
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Hurt
Defendant:
U.S. Constitution, William T. Booker, All National Clergy and others
United States of America v. North Georgia Electric Membership Corporation, et al
as 5:2016cv00820
Defendant:
North Georgia Electric Membership Corporation, Huntington Ingalls Inc., Harsco Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901
W.B. Brawley Company v. PEAC Consulting, LLC
as 7:2016cv00304
Plaintiff:
W.B. Brawley Company
Defendant:
PEAC Consulting, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CUSH-EL v. THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2016cv00610
Plaintiff:
PEACE ELLUVASUN ALLAH CUSH-EL
Defendant:
THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, ROBERT TAYLOR, PAT MCCRORY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CUSH-EL v. STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 1:2016cv00176
Plaintiff:
PEACE ELLUVASUN ALLAH CUSH-EL
Defendant:
STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH DIVISION OF VITAL RECORDS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CUSH-EL v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2016cv00139
Plaintiff:
PEACE ELLUVASUN ALLAH CUSH-EL
Defendant:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, CABARRUS COUNTY DEPT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, CHILDREN ADVOCACY CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
