Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 41 - 50 of 234
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv03454
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
PEARSON v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 2:2018cv02965
Defendant: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff: SHARON E. PEARSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv02854
Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor In Possession: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
HOLDER v. SMITH et al
as 3:2018cv00134
Plaintiff: GLYNN A. HOLDER
Defendant: BARRY R. SMITH, CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, JANET PEARSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. NAJI et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv00110
Plaintiff: ANTHONY WILLIAMS
Defendant: DR. MUHAMMED NAJI, JANET PEARSON, PATRICK NAGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv01709
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
BOOZER v. SMITH et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv00006
Plaintiff: RICHARD L. BOOZER, SR.
Defendant: GARRY SMITH, DAVID J. CLOSE, FOT CENTRALIZED SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boozer v. Smith et al
as 3:2017cv02269
Plaintiff: Richard L. Boozer, Sr.
Defendant: Garry Smith, David J. Close, FOT Centralized Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GIVENS v. NAJI et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv00222
Plaintiff: ISAIAH J. GIVENS
Defendant: MUHAMMAD GHASSAN NAJI , CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, LLC , BARRY SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. WETZEL et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv00192
Plaintiff: MUSTAFA WILLIAMS
Defendant: J. PEARSON and JOHN/JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?