Cases 31 - 40 of 58
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2015cv62680
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
US v. Gomez-Genao
as 15-2449
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
PEDRO GOMEZ-GENAO, a/k/a Carlos Acosta
Roosevelt Cayman Asset Company II v. Gomez-Rosario et al
as 3:2015cv02749
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Cayman Asset Company II
Defendant:
Pedro Gomez-Rosario, Iris Yolanda Panet-Serrano and Conjugal Partnership Gomez-Panet
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1703
Martin et al v. City of New York, New York
as 1:2014cv08950
Plaintiff:
Steve Martin, Olatumbosun Adeagbo, Wale Ademoye and others
Defendant:
City of New York, New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Gomez v. Gautreaux et al
as 3:2014cv00169
Defendant:
Sid J. Gautreaux, III, Cody Grace and Unknown Zapata
Plaintiff:
Pedro Gomez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. Pedro Gomez-Pena
as 14-50083
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
PEDRO GOMEZ-PENA
USA v. Jorge Gomez-Reye
as 14-20009
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JORGE GOMEZ-REYES, also known as Jorge Pedro Gomez, also known as Jorge Gomez, also known as Jorge Gomez Reyes, also known as Aurelio Nicolas Tapia, also known as Aurelio N. Tapia, also known as Aurelio Tapia-Nicolas, also known as Aurelio Tapia Nicolas
Squitieri-Sifontes et al
as 3:2013cv01794
Plaintiff:
Paul Squitieri-Sifontes , Emma Gomez-De Perez , Nelson Ramos-Irizarry and others
Defendant:
UBS Bank USA , UBS Financial Service, Inc. , UBS Financial Services Incorporated of Puerto Rico and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
USA v. Pedro Gomez-Martinez
as 13-14388
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
PEDRO GOMEZ-MARTINEZ
US v. Pedro Gomez-Jimenez
as 12-5009
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
PEDRO GOMEZ-JIMENEZ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
