Cases 61 - 70 of 115
Van Meter v. Reteke et al
as 3:2011cv00289
Plaintiff:
Michael Paul Van Meter
Defendant:
Clair Reteke, Mark Sevier, Sally Stevenson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vermillion v. Plank et al
as 3:2011cv00280
Plaintiff:
Jay F Vermillion
Defendant:
Willard Plank, Charles Whelan, Dawn Buss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VAN METER v. RETEKE et al
as 1:2011cv00848
All Are Sued In Their Individual And Official Capacitie:
CHARLES A. PENFOLD
Defendant:
CLAIR RETEKE, MARK SEVIER and SALLY STEVENSON
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PAUL VAN METER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WASHINGTON v. KING et al
as 2:2011cv00151
Defendant:
JAMES BASINGER, LIEUTENANT STEVE KING and CARL A. PENFOLD
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WASHINGTON v. KING et al
as 2:2011cv00150
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT JAMES BASINGER, LIEUTENANT STEVE KING and CARL A. PENFOLD
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McNARY v. HUSTON et al
as 2:2011cv00131
Defendant:
JAMES BASINGER, D. BROUGH, JERRY HUSTON and others
Plaintiff:
DARRELL McNARY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert L. Holleman v. Charles A. Penfold, et al
as 11-2059
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT LEE HOLLEMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES A. PENFOLD, EDWIN G. BUSS, M. HALE and others
Myers v. Levenhagen et al
as 3:2011cv00187
Plaintiff:
Darryl Myers
Defendant:
Mark Levenhagen, Bret Mize, Chuck Penfold and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SAFRA National Bank of New Yor v. Penfold Investment Trading, Lt
as 11-1615
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAFRA National Bank of New York
Defendant - Appellee:
Penfold Investment Trading, Ltd., Hamilton De Oliveira Rimes and Stonehill Holdings LLC
Frohwerk v. Johnson et al
as 2:2011cv00133
Plaintiff:
David Frohwerk
Defendant:
Bobby Johnson, Rhonda Vega, Mark Levenhagen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
