Cases 1 - 8 of 8
ELOAHBEY v. SOSAVICKA et al
as 2:2024cv00556
Plaintiff:
ZAMA ELOAHBEY
Defendant:
DAVID SOSAVICKA, CHESWICK MAGISTERIAL, CANDACE WINSTEAD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00446
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
KARVAN v. PENN HILLS POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2023cv00132
Plaintiff:
DAVID KARVAN
Defendant:
PENN HILLS POLICE DEPARTMENT, OFFICER DENNIS ROBL and OFFICER DAVID KLOBUCHER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barbara Thompkins, et al v. Municipality of Penn Hills, et al
as 22-3012
Plaintiff / Appellee:
BARBARA ANN THOMPKINS, Individually, ERIC KLAVON, her husband and PENN HILLS POLICE DEPARTMENT
Defendant / Appellee:
MUNICIPALITY OF PENN HILLS and OFFICER ALYSSA FINNIGAN
Defendant / Appellant:
SPC DAVID KLOBUCHER
Defendant:
OFFICER MUNICIPALITY OF PENN HILLS and OFFICER PENN HILLS POLICE DEPARTMENT
MURRAY v. PENN HILLS POLICE et al
as 2:2021cv01531
Plaintiff:
RUBY MURRAY
Defendant:
PENN HILLS POLICE, THE CITY OF PITTSBURGH and THE STATE OF PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
THOMPKINS et al v. MUNICIPALITY OF PENN HILLS et al
as 2:2021cv00320
Defendant:
PENN HILLS POLICE DEPARTMENT, OFFICER ALYSSA FINNIGAN, MUNICIPALITY OF PENN HILLS and others
Plaintiff:
ERIC KLAVON and BARBARA ANN THOMPKINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SIMS v. PENN HILLS POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2020cv01130
Defendant:
OFFICER JOHN DOE, DETECTIVE KRAH, BUREAU OF NARCOTIC INVESTIGATION and others
Plaintiff:
NEAL SIMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAMAGNA v. JOHN DOE PENN HILLS POLICE OFFICERS et al
as 2:2008cv00317
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY LAMAGNA
Defendant:
JOHN DOE PENN HILLS POLICE OFFICERS, JOHN DOE PLUM BOROUGH POLICE OFFICERS and THE ALLEGHENY COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
