Cases
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01939
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
BROWN v. PENNSYLVANIA STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2018cv01476
Defendant: ROBERTA PAVLICK, PENNSYLVANIA STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DAWN LEGARS and others
Plaintiff: JAMES BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
BROWN v. PENNSYLVANIA STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2018cv00355
Defendant: ROBERTA PAVLICK, PENNSYLVANIA STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DAWN LEGARS and others
Plaintiff: JAMES BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
CASTRO v. PENNSYLVANIA STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 2:2018cv01477
Defendant: PENNSYLVANIA STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Plaintiff: RAYMOND CASTRO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
RODRIGUEZ et al v. PENNSYLVANIA STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2018cv00200
Defendant: ROBERTA PAVLICK, PENNSYLVANIA STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DAWN LEGARS and others
Plaintiff: JAMES BROWN, RAYMOND CASTRO, JOHN DOES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Bryan Shine v. Basil Merenda, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-2080
Plaintiff - Appellant: BRYAN J. SHINE
Defendant - Appellee: BASIL MERENDA, SHAWN D. KOFLUK, TIMOTHY REIDDEHL and others
Defendant - Appellant: JOSEPH MCGETTIGAN
SESSOM v. PENNSYLVANIA STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv02179
Petitioner: ROGER SESSOM
Respondent: PENNSYLVANIA STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS , MICHAEL WENEROWICZ and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bryan Shine v. Basil Merenda, et al
as 12-4482
Plaintiff - Appellant: BRYAN J. SHINE
Defendant - Appellee: BASIL MERENDA, SHAWN D. KOFLUK, TIMOTHY REIDDEHL and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?