Cases 31 - 40 of 79
Moises Madriz et al v. PepsiCo, Inc. et al
as 5:2022cv00549
Plaintiff:
Moises Madriz and Rodney Ulloa
Defendant:
PepsiCo, Inc., Naked Juice Co., Naked Juice Co. of Glendora, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Marshall v. Pepsico, Inc., et al
as 7:2022cv02370
Plaintiff:
Seth Marshall
Defendant:
Pepsico, Inc.,, Bottling Group, LLC and CB Manufacturing Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 021
Stevens v. PepsiCo Inc. et al
as 7:2022cv00802
Plaintiff:
Emanuele Stevens
Defendant:
PepsiCo Inc., Bottling Group, LLC and CB Manufacturing Company, Inc.
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Seth Marshall, Jacob Tschudy, Devin Drobsch and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Frito-Lay North America, Inc., The Quaker Oats Company, Does 1 through 50, inclusive and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203 FLSA: Definitions
McKenney v. Pepsico, Inc et al
as 2:2021cv13000
Plaintiff:
Marcus McKenney
Defendant:
Pepsico, Inc, New Bern Transport Corporation and Anthony Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Davis v. PepsiCo, Inc.
as 1:2020cv01961
Defendant:
PepsiCo., Inc., Bottling Group, LLC and PepsiCo, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Michael Davis, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661
Leach v. Pepsico, Inc.
as 6:2020cv03033
Plaintiff:
Rachel Leach
Defendant:
Pepsico, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Stockton v. PepsiCo, Inc.
as 2:2019cv00073
Plaintiff:
James Stockton
Defendant:
PepsiCo, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Hightower v. Frito-Lay Inc et al
as 5:2019cv00679
Plaintiff:
Norman L Hightower
Defendant:
Pepsico Inc and Frito-Lay Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Marquez v. Rolling Frito-Lay Sales, LP
as 2:2019cv00132
Plaintiff:
Michael Marquez
Defendant:
Pepsico, Inc. and Rolling Frito-Lay Sales, LP
Beatovic v. The PEPSICO Inc Disability Plan et al
as 1:2019cv01736
Defendant:
The PEPSICO Inc Disability Plan and Sedgwick Claims Management Services Inc.
Plaintiff:
Dwight M Beatovic
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
