Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Muhammad v. Whitlow et al
as 5:2010cv00586
Plaintiff: Pete Noble Muhammad
Defendant: Richard K. Whitlow, Scott A. Iked, A. B. Jarema and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pete Muhammad v. Jesse Reaves, Jr.
as 11-6186
Plaintiff - Appellant: PETE NOBLE MUHAMMAD
Defendant - Appellee: JESSE J. REAVES, JR., Federal Probation Officer, DESDEMONA L. FAISON, Chief Federal Probation, GREGORY DAVIS, Federal Public Defender and others
US v. Pete Muhammad We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-6150
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: PETE NOBLE MUHAMMAD, a/k/a Pete Smith, a/k/a Jose
In re: Pete Smith We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-2357
Petitioner: In re: PETE SMITH, a/k/a Jose, a/k/a Pete Noble Muhammad
:
Muhammad v. Plaster
as 5:2010ct03199
Plaintiff: Pete Noble Muhammad
Defendant: Scott Plaster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MUHAMMAD v. REAVES et al
as 1:2010cv00832
Plaintiff: PETE NOBLE MUHAMMAD
Defendant: JESSE J. REAVES, JR., DESDEMONA FAISON, GREGORY DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MUHAMMAD v. USA
as 1:2010cv00649
Petitioner: PETE NOBLE MUHAMMAD
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
MUHAMMAD v. BUREAU OF PRISON et al
as 1:2010cv00397
Petitioner: PETE NOBLE MUHAMMAD
Respondent: BUREAU OF PRISON and U.S. MARSHAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MUHAMMAD v. BUREAU OF PRISON et al
as 1:2010cv00267
Petitioner: PETE NOBLE MUHAMMAD
Respondent: BUREAU OF PRISON, U.S. MARSHAL and ORANGE COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
MUHAMMAD v. BUREAU OF PRISON et al
as 1:2010cv00225
Petitioner: PETE NOBLE MUHAMMAD
Respondent: BUREAU OF PRISON , U.S. MARSHAL and ORANGE COUNTY SHERIFF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?