Cases 51 - 60 of 242
Peterson v. Life Insurance Company of North America
as 4:2021cv05071
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America
Plaintiff:
Tamara Peterson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Blodgett v. Peterson
as 4:2021cv05056
Defendant:
Dr. Mary Peterson
Plaintiff:
Jacob Randall Blodgett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
West et al v. City of Montesano et al
as 3:2021cv05077
Defendant:
The City of Hoquiam, Washington, The City of Montesano, Washington, The City of Aberdeen, Washington and others
Plaintiff:
Amanda West, both individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Patrick Easton West, Patrick Errol West, Bertha West and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peterson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2021cv00094
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Peterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01576
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peterson Wampold Rosato Feldman Luna v. United States Coast Guard
as 2:2020cv01451
Plaintiff:
Peterson Wampold Rosato Feldman Luna
Defendant:
United States Coast Guard
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Denton v. Thrasher et al
as 3:2020cv05968
Defendant:
T Sharp, Troy Aidan, Ron Haynes and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Denton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alpha Venture Capital Partners LP et al v. Pourhassan et al
as 3:2020cv05909
Plaintiff:
Gavin Myers, Alpha Venture Capital Partners LP, Law Offices of Kenneth E. Chyten 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan and others
Nominal Defendant:
CytoDyn, Inc. and CytoDyn Inc
Defendant:
Nader Z. Pourhassan and Nader Z Pourhassan
Peterson v. Inslee et al
as 3:2020cv05761
Plaintiff:
Heidi S Peterson
Defendant:
Jay Inslee, State of Washington, Wendy Scheafer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
