Cases 61 - 70 of 730
Lavount Peterson v. Administrator East Jersey State Prison, et al
as 22-3453
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAVOUNT PETERSON
Defendant / Appellee:
ADMINISTRATOR EAST JERSEY STATE PRISON and ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY
PETERSON v. LUITPOLD PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv05230
Plaintiff:
NATASHA PETERSON
Defendant:
LUITPOLD PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., AMERICAN REGENT, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC. v. PETERSON
as 1:2022cv00354
Plaintiff:
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC.
Defendant:
NICKOLAS N. PETERSON doing business as TAVERN 618
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553 U.S.C.A. Cable Communications Policy Act
Alexander Peterson v. Gina Orlando, et al
as 22-3013
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALEXANDER PETERSON
Defendant / Appellee:
GINA ORLANDO, SCI-PHX Staff and (JOHN DOE) C/O GUARD PURIFOY
Dixon v. Signify Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01339
Plaintiff:
Brian Dixon
Defendant:
Signify Health, Inc., Matthew S. Holt, Kyle B. Peterson and others
USA v. Allany Peterson-Mendez
as 22-2881
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellee:
ALLANY PETERSON-MENDEZ
Dixon v. Zymergen Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01278
Plaintiff:
Brian Dixon
Defendant:
Zymergen Inc., Jay Flatley, Sandra Peterson and others
Lawrence v. Covetrus, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01234
Plaintiff:
Richard Lawrence
Defendant:
Covetrus, Inc., Philip A. Laskawy, Deborah G. Ellinger and others
Cooper v. Knapp et al
as 1:2022cv01323
Plaintiff:
Jamil Cooper
Defendant:
Unit Manager Knapp, Richard Ellers, Corrections Officer Chicolite and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anthony Testa v. DOJ, et al
as 22-2478
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY J. TESTA
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, THOMSON-REUTERS & SUBSIDIARIES, THOMSON-REUTERS HOLDINGS INC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
