Cases 1 - 10 of 380
Peterson et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01710
Plaintiff:
Harold Peterson and Lindsey Peterson
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Keita v. Huckell et al
as 0:2024cv00598
Plaintiff:
Mamady Kalifa Keita
Defendant:
Scott Huckell, Matthew Russell, Jonanthan C. Peterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peterson et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv00371
Plaintiff:
Donna Peterson and Timmy Peterson
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Peterson v. State of Minnesota
as 0:2024cv00188
Plaintiff:
Seth Peterson
Defendant:
State of Minnesota
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Aho et al v. Cass County et al
as 0:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Aho and Chad Cane
Defendant:
Cass County, Sandy Bennett, Jerri Huston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pickle v. Minnesota Association of Townships et al
as 0:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Robert J. Pickle
Defendant:
Minnesota Association of Townships, Jeffrey S. Krueger, Steven M. Fenske and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ballast Advisors, LLC v. Peterson et al
as 0:2023cv03769
Plaintiff:
Ballast Advisors, LLC
Defendant:
Scott A Peterson, Melinda M. Bradley, MMX Wealth Partners, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Harper v. Segal et al
as 0:2023cv03468
Plaintiff:
Kelly Harper
Defendant:
Warden Michael Segal, Susan Brown, Associate Warden Vaught and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Breen v. Ramsey County et al
as 0:2023cv03398
Plaintiff:
Matthew Breen
Defendant:
Ramsey County, Frank Demike, Hawa Hassan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jenkins v. United States of America et al
as 0:2023cv03253
Plaintiff:
Betty Lee Jenkins
Defendant:
United States of America, Colette Peters, Andre Matevousian and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
