Cases 11 - 20 of 295
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00526
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv06169
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
PETTIES v. AHMAD et al
as 2:2023cv22662
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY DEROME PETTIES
Defendant:
OFFICER AHMAD, OFFICER MEADE and OFFICER RIVERA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv04562
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
CELESTIN v. MARAJ-PETTY et al
as 1:2023cv03335
Defendant:
ONIKA MARAJ-PETTY, AUBREY GRAHAM, DAVID BREWSTER and others
Plaintiff:
ROSE Y. CELESTIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Padgett v. Petti et al
as 4:2023cv01764
Plaintiff:
Lynn A. Padgett
Defendant:
James Petti, Robert B. McGuiness, Daniel J. Barrett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Petty v. Souza et al
as 1:2023cv00422
Defendant:
Keoni Bryant, Kevin Souza, Voltaire Gansit and others
Plaintiff:
Tony Ray Petty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01691
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Young v. Midland County, Texas et al
as 7:2023cv00146
Plaintiff:
Clinton Lee Young
Defendant:
Midland County, Texas, Weldon (Ralph) Petty, Jr., Albert Schorre, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv16761
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
