Cases 1 - 10 of 1,393
Ackerman v. Rigney et al
as 2:2024cv00935
Plaintiff:
Jin Ackerman
Defendant:
Curtis Rigney, T. Phelps, William Gittere and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Gorbey v. Brian Davis, et al
as 24-11527
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY
Defendant:
BRIAN J. DAVIS, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISIONS, JOHN DOE #1 and others
LaNear v. Phelps County Jail et al
as 4:2024cv00629
Plaintiff:
Bryce LaNear
Defendant:
Phelps County Jail and Lt. Unknown Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phelps v. Jackson et al
as 1:2024cv02325
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Marquise Phelps
Defendant:
K. Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Omar et al (PS) v. Diggins et al
as 1:2024cv01118
Plaintiff:
Ellu M. Omar, Demetrius M. Wallace, Jerren R. Pack and others
Defendant:
Diggins, Line, Bruning and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schubert v. Avery et al
as 3:2024cv00212
Plaintiff:
Allan Douglas Schubert
Defendant:
Krystal Avery, Shannon W. Phelps, James Wills and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Phelps v. Alegria et al
as 1:2024cv02851
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Marquise Phelps
Defendant:
A Alegria, T Berecz and J Guevara
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PHELPS v. WARDEN PERRY
as 7:2024cv00031
Petitioner:
WILLIE C PHELPS
Respondent:
WARDEN PERRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Phelps v. Smith et al
as 3:2024cv03068
Plaintiff:
Jermaine M Phelps
Defendant:
. Smith, Mount Sterling Correctional Facility and ERT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Phelps et al
as 3:2024cv00303
Plaintiff:
Shane Anthony Jones
Defendant:
Madison Correctional Security Management, Tangipahoa Parish Jail, Leslie Phelps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
