Cases 41 - 50 of 119
Palmer v. York County Pennsylvania et al
as 1:2020cv00539
Defendant:
Dr. Rameen Starling-Roney, John Doe Prison Guards 1-10, President Judge Joseph Adams and others
Plaintiff:
Rose Palmer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kern v. Ramos et al
as 3:2020cv00053
Defendant:
L.P.N. Christine Feyjoo, D.O. Kenneth Wloczewski, Monroe County Correctional Facility and others
Plaintiff:
Renee Kern
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHANDLER v. PRIME CARE MEDICAL, INC. ET AL
as 5:2019cv06176
Defendant:
PRIME CARE MEDICAL, INC. ET AL
Plaintiff:
NADIR NAIM CHANDLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SOM v. PRIME CARE MEDICAL, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv05353
Defendant:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILTY, COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY, JUDITH MCILHONE and others
Plaintiff:
PURNIMA SOM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SCHRUBY v. SIANNI et al
as 2:2019cv04206
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK SCHRUBY and TEEF
Defendant:
JOHN DOE #5, CLAYTON, JANE DOE NURSE #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NEWMAN-BEY v. PRIME CARE MEDICAL INC. et al
as 5:2019cv02069
Defendant:
PRIME CARE MEDICAL INC. and JESSE KIRSCH
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH NEWMAN-BEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FENNELL v. NORTHAMPTON COUNTY et al
as 5:2019cv01972
Defendant:
DAVID COLLINS, C.O. BAKER, C.O. CROWLEY and others
Plaintiff:
JAMARCUS FENNELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOORE v. BERKS COUNTY JAIL SYSTEM et al
as 5:2019cv00512
Defendant:
SGT DAVIS, CORRECTION OFFICER ESTES, KITCHEN OFFICER MATA and others
Plaintiff:
WAYMAN MOORE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Speraw v. Catone et al
as 1:2018cv02310
Defendant:
Shanna Cox, Gary Eichelberger, Toby Catone and others
Plaintiff:
David Nelson Speraw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diaz v. Dauphin County Work Release Center et al
as 1:2018cv02159
Defendant:
Prime Care Medical Inc., Dauphin County Pennsylvania, Dauphin County Prison and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Diaz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
