Cases 21 - 30 of 44
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-2554
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-2325
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00023
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv00007
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Bartley v. Indiana Department of Child Services et al
as 3:2014cv02001
Plaintiff:
Jason Bartley
Defendant:
Indiana Department of Child Services, David Whitlock, Clinton County Probation Department and others
Miscellaneous_party:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-3162
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
JENKINS v. PROBATION DEPARTMENT, CLARK CIRCUIT COURT NO. 2
as 4:2013cv00157
Defendant:
CHIEF PROBATION OFFICER, PROBATION DEPARTMENT, CLARK CIRCUIT COURT NO. 2 and PROBATION DEPARTMENT, CLARK CIRCUIT COURT NO. 2
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS JENKINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Keller v. Finks et al
as 3:2013cv03117
Plaintiff:
Corey Keller
Defendant:
Thomas Finks , Christian County Adult Probation Department and Amy Calvert Winans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Watt et al v. Papiernik et al
as 3:2012cv50410
Plaintiff:
Azalea Watt and Latrell Girley-Watt
Defendant:
John Papiernik, Winnebago County, Illinois and Winnebago County Juvenile Probation Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Addones Spencer v. Kenneth Fries, et al
as 12-3518
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ADDONES SPENCER
Defendant - Appellee:
KENNETH FRIES, JEREMY TINKEL, UNITED STATES PROBATION DEPARTMENT and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
