Cases 1 - 9 of 9
PROBST v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
as 1:2022cv01986
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER M. PROBST
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
PROBST v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY et al
as 1:2022cv01106
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER M. PROBST
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, DAVID A. RICKS and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Casis et al v. City of New York
as 1:2022cv01926
Plaintiff:
Sally Casis, Jermaine Harrison, Sergio Rivera and others
Defendant:
City of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
GANTS v. PROBST ELECTRIC INC et al
as 1:2018cv00257
Defendant:
QUANTA SERVICES INC and PROBST ELECTRIC INC
Plaintiff:
AMY GANTS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Reyes et al v. A1 Reliable Industries Corp. et al
as 2:2015cv03579
Defendant:
A1 Reliable Industries Corp., Wayne Danenza and Pat Probst
Plaintiff:
Jose Alvarado-Zavala, Dennis Campos, Reinaldo Cruz and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
T.R. v. Quality Home Maintenance Incorporated et al
as 2:2015cv00912
Plaintiff:
T.R.
Defendant:
Quality Home Maintenance Incorporated , Cory Holman , Unknown Holman and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Brown et al v. Day and Zimmerman, Inc. et al
as 5:2015cv04859
Defendant:
Day and Zimmerman, Inc. , Daniel Davis , Ryan Statler and others
Plaintiff:
Chris Brown and James D. Beam
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Solis v. BKS Bethpage, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv06232
Defendant:
BKS Bethpage, Inc., William Caven, John Coumatos and others
Plaintiff:
Hilda Solis
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Kress v. Belmont County Sheriff's Department et al
as 2:2009cv00107
Plaintiff:
Joseph Kress, Joseph Kress and Joseph Kress
Defendant:
Belmont County Sheriff's Department, Fred Thompson, Belmont County Board of Commissioners and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
