Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-20116
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Angel Rivera v. Arianna Dempsey, et al
as 26-1069
Plaintiff:
ANGEL RIVERA
Defendant:
ARIANNA DEMPSEY, CRNP, STEPHEN DONAHUE, Licensed Psychologist Manger SCI-Frackville, SHAWN KEPHART, Deputy Superintendent of Centralized Services SCI-Frackville and others
Jalil Reed v. Garcia, et al
as 25-3441
Plaintiff:
JALIL S. REED
Defendant:
LT. GARCIA, SCI-Dallas, LT. M. CONRAD, C.O. HARRISON and others
Coit v. Elwell et al
as 1:2025cv01865
Plaintiff:
Kevin Terrance Coit
Defendant:
Lt. Elwell, Deputy Albert, Superintendent Gourley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KAUFMANN v. CLOSE et al
as 3:2025cv00334
Plaintiff:
DIANE L. KAUFMANN
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT DAVID CLOSE, JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-10, OFFICER FNU J. MORRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
William Jackson v. Kelly Novack, et al
as 25-2843
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM JACKSON
Defendant:
UNIT MANAGER BAUMGARDNER, SCI-Benner, PSS. D, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER DETWILER, SCI-Benner and others
Kevin Coit v. Laurel Harry, et al
as 25-2601
Plaintiff:
KEVIN COIT
Defendant:
LAUREL HARRY, SEC, M. ZAKEN, STINE and others
CROMER v. SISSEM et al
as 1:2025cv00261
Plaintiff:
JOHN CROMER, JR.
Defendant:
WARDEN SISSEM, SCI FOREST RHU C/O.S, CCPM. A. EISENMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
CROMER v. PRISON OFFICIALS- SCI FOREST et al
as 1:2025cv00217
Plaintiff:
JOHN CROMER, JR.
Defendant:
PRISON OFFICIALS- SCI FOREST, PSS TRASK, JOHN DOE'S/JANE DOE'S and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Kevin Coit v. Laurel Harry, et al
as 25-1964
Plaintiff:
KEVIN COIT
Defendant:
DEPUTY SECRETARY LAUREL HARRY, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, EDSI MICHAEL WENEROWICZ and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
