Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Pacific Indemnity Company v. Carr
as 1:2015cv00301
Plaintiff:
Pacific Indemnity Company
Defendant:
Megan M. Carr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pacific Indemnity Company v. Added Dimensions, Inc.
as 1:2014cv03313
Plaintiff:
Pacific Indemnity Company
Defendant:
Added Dimensions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pacific Indemnity Company v. Added Dimensions, Inc.
as 8:2014cv03313
Plaintiff:
Pacific Indemnity Company
Defendant:
Added Dimensions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pacific Indemnity Company v. DCM Construction LLC et al
as 0:2013cv01200
Plaintiff:
Pacific Indemnity Company
Defendant:
DCM Construction Company LLC and Dallas Electrical & Plumbing Contractors Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
FEDERAL INSURANCE CO. et al v. AL QAIDA, et al
as 1:2012mc00030
Plaintiff:
FEDERAL INSURANCE CO. , PACIFIC INDEMNITY COMPANY, CHUBB CUSTOM INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Defendant:
AL QAIDA, EGYPTIAN ISLAMIC JIHAD, ASBAT AL-ANSAR and others
Chubb & Son et al v. C & C Complete Services, LLC et al
as 8:2012cv01127
Plaintiff:
Chubb & Son , Federal Insurance Company , Chubb Custom Insurance Company and others
Defendant:
C & C Complete Services, LLC , William C. Cornelius, Jr. , David L. King and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pacific Indemnity Company v. Whaley
as 1:2007cv00826
Plaintiff:
Pacific Indemnity Company and Pacific Indemnity Company
Defendant:
Clay H. Whaley
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
Clay H Whaley
ThirdParty Defendant:
Compton & Sons and Compton & Sons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Out of Chaos, Ltd., et al v. Federal Ins. Co., et al
as 1:2000cv00592
Plaintiff:
Out of Chaos, Ltd.
Defendant:
The Chubb Corporation, Federal Insurance Co., Vigilant Insurance Company and others
Petitioner:
J. Michael Curtis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
