Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Wallace Mitchell v. Harley Lappin, et al
as 21-3355
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WALLACE MITCHELL
Defendant:
HARLEY LAPPIN, Director-Bureau of Prisons, THOMAS R. KANE, Director Federal Bureau of Prisons, HARRELL WATTS, Administrator/Bureau of Prisons and others
Mitchell v. Lappin et al
as 1:2021cv00163
Defendant:
Kevin Bittenbender, Mark Preoria, David C. Young and others
Plaintiff:
Wallace Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Glover v. Bryson
as 1:2020cv01836
Defendant:
Dept. Saltenburger, Noel Kercey, Dept. Packer and others
Plaintiff:
Larry R. Glover
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parker v. Wal-Mart et al
as 1:2020cv00718
Defendant:
Joshua Packered Lowe and Wal-Mart
Plaintiff:
Chad Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McElrath v. Karshen et al
as 2:2020cv00183
Defendant:
Sean R Cleveland, Jay Ti Williams, Steven Peterson and others
Plaintiff:
Donald L McElrath
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dickerson v. Whelan
as 2:2019cv00178
Defendant:
MSDF Record Office, Jane Doe, Jane/John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Travis Dickerson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Babcock v. USDA Packers and Stockyards Program
as 1:2018cv00297
Plaintiff:
Kelley A.E. Babcock
Defendant:
USDA Packers and Stockyards Program
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Biggins v. Minner et al
as 1:2017cv01739
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Biggins
Defendant:
Matt Denn, Perry Phelps, Delaware Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Biggins v. Robert Coupe, et al
as 16-4333
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT COUPE, PERRY PHELPS, Deputy Assistant Principle, CHRISTOPHER RLEIN, Chief and others
Packer v. Alabama Department of Corrections (INMATE 1)
as 2:2015cv00628
Plaintiff:
Kendall Packer
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
