Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Sofia Cano v. South Carolina Department of Corrections
as 24-6200
Plaintiff:
SOFIA CANO
Defendant:
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, BRYAN P. STIRLING, DR. CHRIS KUNKLE and others
CANO v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 9:2022cv04247
Plaintiff:
SOFIA CANO
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections, Bryan P. Stirling, DR. Chris Kunkle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Wilder v. Medical Department Staff et al
as 0:2019cv01533
Defendant:
Ms Stacey Drawdy, Stacy Drawdy, Major Morris and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher T. Wilder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garrett v. Stirling et al
as 0:2018cv01309
Plaintiff:
Robert Louis Garrett, Jr.
Defendant:
Bryan P. Stirling, Bernard McKie, Franklin Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Derrick v. Sanofi S.A. et al
as 2:2017cv02454
Plaintiff:
Pamela Derrick
Defendant:
Sanofi S.A., Aventis Pharma S.A. and Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bessent v. Byrnes et al
as 8:2017cv00462
Plaintiff:
Derrick Ternell Bessent
Defendant:
Thomas E Byrnes and Pamela Derrick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eaddy v. Derrick et al
as 5:2013cv02692
Plaintiff:
Donald Earl Eaddy
Defendant:
Pamela Derrick, Thomas Byrne, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Byrnes et al
as 1:2012cv01056
Plaintiff:
Henry Lee King
Defendant:
Thomas Byrnes and Pamela Derrick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tosconi v. Litton et al
as 8:2011cv03171
Plaintiff:
Nico Coty Tosconi
Defendant:
Kathe Litton, Warden Pate, Cleveland Stokes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armstrong v. Benoir et al
as 2:2010cv00072
Plaintiff:
Terry Darrell Armstrong
Defendant:
Michael Benoir, John R Pate, Author Jordon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
