Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Escamilla v. Elliott
as 21-50931
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Rachel Escamilla
Defendant / Appellee:
Pamela Elliott and Edwards County, Texas
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00079
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Rachel Escamilla v. Pamela Elliott, et al
as 19-50324
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RACHEL ESCAMILLA
Defendant / Appellee:
PAMELA ELLIOTT and EDWARDS COUNTY, TEXAS
Escalante v. Elliott et al
as 2:2018cv00045
Defendant:
Bobby Buscha, Mark Cox, Jason Reid and others
Plaintiff:
Rene G Escalante
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Escamilla v. Elliott et al
as 2:2016cv00121
Defendant:
Edwards County Texas and Pamela Elliott
Plaintiff:
Rachel Escamilla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - 42:1983 Civil Rights
ELLIOTT v. COLVIN
as 2:2013cv06428
Plaintiff:
PAMELA ELLIOTT
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Rachel Jernigan v. Pamela Elliott, et al
as 12-15562
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RACHEL JERNIGAN
Defendant:
PAMELA ELLIOTT, FKA Pamela Brock, RANDY MCLAWS, DAVID LANDGRAF and others
Defendant - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Rachel Jernigan v. Pamela Elliott, et al
as 12-15429
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RACHEL JERNIGAN
Defendant - Appellant:
PAMELA ELLIOTT, FKA Pamela Brock and RANDY MCLAWS
Defendant:
DAVID LANDGRAF, CITY OF GILBERT, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Rachel Jernigan v. Pamela Elliott, et al
as 12-15286
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RACHEL JERNIGAN
Defendant - Appellant:
PAMELA ELLIOTT, FKA Pamela Brock and RANDY MCLAWS
Defendant:
DAVID LANDGRAF, CITY OF GILBERT, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Elliott et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv01282
Plaintiff:
Pamela Elliott and Robert Elliott
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc and Thomas P. Schmalzried, M.D.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
