Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Smart v. Annucci et al
as 7:2019cv07908
Plaintiff:
Pamela Smart
Defendant:
Donald Venettozzi, L. Corbie, Joseph Joseph and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marvin v. MacDonald
as 19-1113
Respondent:
GORDON J. MACDONALD
Petitioner:
MARK MARVIN
Interested Party:
PAMELA SMART
Dennis Davis, Jr. v. Robert Whyce, et al
as 18-30763
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DENNIS RAY DAVIS, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT BOBBY WHYCE, CHERLY STILLS, YOULANDA WILLIAMS and others
Smart v. Gifford
as 18-445
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Pamela Smart
Defendant - Appellee:
Corrections Officer Michael Gifford, Beford Hills Correctional Facility, Joseph Joseph, Deputy Superintendent of Programs, Donald Selsky, Director of Disciplinary and Special Housing, Department of Corrections and Community Supervision and others
Killingsworth v. Jackson et al
as 5:2018cv00017
Plaintiff:
Steven Roy Killingsworth
Defendant:
Steven Jackson, Lyndon B Johnson, Louis Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Antywane Williams v. Judge Cox, et al
as 17-30304
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTYWANE ERIC WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
JUDGE COX, DISTRICT ATTORNEY JACOBS, COUNSELOR BOBIER and others
Antywane Williams v. Judge Cox, et al
as 16-31187
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTYWANE ERIC WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
JUDGE COX, DISTRICT ATTORNEY JACOBS, COUNSELOR BOBIER and others
Williams v. Cox et al
as 5:2015cv02805
Plaintiff:
Antywane Williams
Defendant:
Cox, Jacobs, Bobier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smart v. Gifford et al
as 7:2015cv08939
Plaintiff:
Pamela Smart
Defendant:
M. Gifford, Joseph Joseph, Donald Selsky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hudson v. Bossier Parish et al
as 5:2014cv02347
Plaintiff:
James Hudson
Defendant:
Sheriff of Bossier Parish, Warden Bossier Parish Jails, Mayor of Bossier Parish and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
