Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Pandey v. Merchia
as 3:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
Abhinav Naresh Pandey
Defendant:
Pankaj Merchia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 rl Diversity-Rent Lease & Ejectment
Merchia v. Klein et al
as 1:2023cv12365
Plaintiff:
Pro Se Party Pankaj Merchia
Defendant:
Harrison Klein, Berel Krug, Mark Lyman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Merchia v. Lamb and Associates, PC, et al
as 23-1330
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PANKAJ MERCHIA
Defendant / Appellee:
LAMB AND ASSOCIATES, PC, MARTIN LAMB, BEREL KRUG and others
Merchia v. Keough et al
as 1:2023cv10494
Plaintiff:
Pankaj Merchia
Defendant:
John Keough, Andrea Keough, Fisher Hill Realty Trust and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Merchia v. Braga et al
as 1:2022cv10762
Plaintiff:
Pro Se Party Pankaj Merchia
Defendant:
Joseph Braga, Dan Bennett, Jason Granai and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Merchia v. US, et al
as 22-1051
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PANKAJ MERCHIA
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and CHARLES P. RETTIG, Commissioner
Interested Party:
SHONA PENDSE and MARC OSBORNE
Merchia v. Lamb and Associates, P.C. et al
as 4:2020cv40100
Defendant:
Lamb and Associates, P.C. and Martin Lamb
Plaintiff:
Pro Se Party Pankaj Merchia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Richardson v. Merchia
as 1:2019cv11652
Plaintiff:
margaret E richardson
Defendant:
Pankaj Merchia and Pro Se Party Pankaj Merchia
Not Yet Classified:
Edward F. Harrington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Merchia v. Virginia Board of Medicine, et al
as 19-1571
Defendant / Appellee:
GERALD A. MILSKY, J.D., SHEVAUN ROUKOUS, J.D., SIOBHAN DUNNAVANT, M.D. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PANKAJ MERCHIA
Archway IP Law PLLC et al v. Merchia et al
as 1:2019cv00404
Defendant:
Shona Pendse, D3 Holdings, LLC, VPA, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Ratcliffe and Archway IP Law PLLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
