Cases 31 - 40 of 40
Sheikh v. Brentwood Pizza, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv00326
Defendant:
Brentwood Pizza, Inc., Jitender Kumar, Papa John's International, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Ammar Sheikh
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Gregston v. Papa John's USA, Inc.
as 9:2014cv81281
Plaintiff:
Thomas R. Gregston
Defendant:
Papa John's USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611
Akram v. Brentwood Pizza, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv01934
Plaintiff:
Mohammad Akram
Defendant:
Brentwood Pizza, Inc., Surinder Chopra, Jitender Kumar and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Sea v. Papa John's International, Inc.
as 3:2014cv00252
Plaintiff:
Jason Lee Sea
Defendant:
Papa John's International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hall v. Papa John's International Inc
as 2:2010cv03445
Plaintiff:
Charles William Hall
Defendant:
Papa John's International Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Gabriela Cisneros et al v. Papa Johns USA Inc et al
as 2:2010cv08693
Plaintiff:
Javier Castellanes, Angel Castrellon, Gabriela Cisneros and others
Defendant:
Does, Hakob Karchikyan, Vazgen Karchikyan and others
Movant:
Judge MIchael D Marcus
Callaway v. Papa John's USA, Inc.
as 0:2009cv61989
Plaintiff:
John Callaway
Defendant:
Papa John's USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Perrin v. Papa John's International, Inc.
as 4:2009cv01335
Plaintiff:
William Timothy Perrin
Defendant:
Papa John's International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Jackson v. Papa John's USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv02791
Defendant:
Papa John's USA, Inc. and Papa John's International, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Eusebius Jackson, Eusebius Jackson, Eusebius Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Busby v. Papa John's USA, Inc.
as 2:2007cv14164
Plaintiff:
Christopher Busby and Christopher Busby
Defendant:
Papa John's USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
