Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00535
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Palomar Specialty Insurance Company v. Parker et al
as 7:2023cv00513
Plaintiff:
Palomar Specialty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Walter Ray Parker, Jr. Individually and d/b/a B.P. Plumbing Co. and B.P. Plumbing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Palomar Specialty Insurance Company v. Parker et al
as 4:2023cv00055
Plaintiff:
Palomar Specialty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Walter Ray Parker, Jr., B.P. Plumbing Co., B.P. Plumbing, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Parker v. Gould et al
as 1:2023cv00075
Plaintiff:
Gary Dean Parker, Jr
Defendant:
Anthony Gould, J. Moore, LT Littrel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. USA
as 4:2023cv00044
Petitioner:
Dannie Simon Parker, Jr
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Parker v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2021hc02005
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Petitioner:
Carl Edwin Parker, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
PARKER v. USA
as 1:2020cv00323
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
JIMMY EUGENE PARKER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00518
Cross Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Yet Classified:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00503
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
PARKER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2019cv00036
Petitioner:
JIMMY EUGENE PARKER, JR.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
