Cases 1 - 10 of 328
Behovitz et al v. Barry, County of et al
as 1:2024cv00332
Plaintiff:
Brian Behovitz, George Brunette, Michael Burns and others
Defendant:
Barry, County of, Susan VandeCar, Muskegon, County of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Brown et al v. County of Wayne et al
as 2:2024cv10779
Plaintiff:
Caitlin Brown, Tianna Hubbard, Rozia Robertson and others
Defendant:
County of Wayne and Officer Terri Graham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Parker v. Michigan, State of et al
as 5:2024cv10079
Plaintiff:
Bruce Parker
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, Matthew Baranski, John Doe and others
Parker #593090 v. Mieko et al
as 2:2023cv00213
Plaintiff:
Bruce Parker #593090
Defendant:
Stephen Mieko, Catherine Bauman, Doug Tasson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker #593090 v. Hill
as 2:2023cv00197
Plaintiff:
Bruce Parker #593090
Defendant:
J. Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv12428
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Avery et al v. Kent County et al
as 1:2023cv00929
Plaintiff:
Kellie Sinke, Deborah J. Parker, Peter Avery and others
Defendant:
Kent County, Peter MacGregor, Kenneth D. Parrish and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Other Civil Rights
Price et al v. Chippewa, County of et al
as 2:2023cv00138
Plaintiff:
Diane Veen Price, Sherri Rockwell, Daniel Clement and others
Defendant:
Chippewa, County of, Carmen M. Fazzari, Marjorie Hank and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Parker #593090 v. Bauman et al
as 2:2023cv00128
Plaintiff:
Bruce Parker #593090
Defendant:
Catherine Bauman, D. Tasson, P. Hubble and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
