Cases 1 - 10 of 49
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Maheshkumar Desai et al v. City of San Bernardino et al
as 5:2023cv00839
Plaintiff:
Maheshkumar Desai, Anup Desai, Kalpesh Ahir and others
Defendant:
City of San Bernardino, a municipal corporation, City of San Bernardino Police Officer J. Funn sued as Doe 1, Does 2-10 Inclusive and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SUNKARA v. PATEL et al
as 2:2022cv06903
Defendant:
JAY PATEL, PARUL J PATEL, JAYESHKUMAR PATEL and others
Plaintiff:
SUNIL SUNKARA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00720
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00602
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2021cv01148
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2021cv00917
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
BHATT et al v. GILTMAN et al
as 1:2021cv10471
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-10, ALLEN GILTMAN and NOTRE GROUP LIMITED
Plaintiff:
PARUL A. BHATT and ATUL H. BHATT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ajesh Bhakta, et al v. Dharmendra Bhakta, et al
as 21-55328
Defendant / Appellee:
MINESH M. BHAKTA, an individual, MUKUNDBHAI J. BHAKTA, an individual, ANJALI D. BHAKTA, an individual and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AJESH S. BHAKTA, an individual, PARUL A. BHAKTA, an individual and ARJUN BHAKTA, an individual
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv03047
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
