Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv05127
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
(PS) Shao v. Roberts, et al.
as 2:2022cv00325
Plaintiff:
Yi Tai Shao and Linda Shao
Defendant:
John G. Roberts, Jr., Anthony M. Kennedy, Stephen Breyer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
v. SHAO et al
as 2:2022at00196
Defendant:
Yi Tai SHAO, John G. Roberts, Jr., Anthony M Kennedy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Yi Tai Shao v. John Roberts, et al
as 21-5210
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Yi Tai Shao
Defendant / Appellee:
John G. Roberts, Chief Justice, Anthony M. Kennedy, Associate Justice, Clarence Thomas, Associate Justice and others
Lucas v. Saul
as 1:2020cv00338
Plaintiff:
Christine Lucas and Christine Patricia Lucas
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Yi Tai Shao v. John Roberts, et al
as 19-5014
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Supreme Court, Rice Pichon, BJ Fadem and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Yi Tai Shao, Esquire, Attorney and Yi Tai Shao
SHAO v. KENNEDY et al
as 1:2018cv01233
Plaintiff:
YI TAI SHAO
Defendant:
JOHN G. ROBERTS, ANTHONY M. KENNEDY, CLARENCE THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Earls v. Cantil-Sakauye et al
as 4:2017cv07122
Plaintiff:
Mari-Lynne Earls
Defendant:
Tani Cantil-Sakauye, Patricia Lucas and Xavier Becerra
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
L. L., et al v. Evesham Township Board of Educ, et al
as 15-3596
Plaintiff - Appellant:
L. L. and K. L., minors, individually and by their parent, K.L.
Defendant - Appellee:
EVESHAM TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION, FLORENCE V EVANS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, LOU CASANOVA and others
Shao v. Wang et al
as 5:2014cv01912
Plaintiff:
Yi Tai Shao
Defendant:
Tsan-Kuen Wang, David Sussman, B.J. Fadem and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
