Cases 1 - 10 of 163
State of Florida v. Jones
as 8:2024cv00833
Plaintiff:
State of Florida
Defendant:
Patrick Dwyon Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443 Notice of Removal-Criminal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01109
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX Educational Amendments 1992 - Sex Discrimination
Jones v. Glick et al
as 1:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
Patrick Bernard Jones
Defendant:
Travis J. Glick, Tara Teresa Heign, Michelle Sue Bostain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Patrick Lee Jones v. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 2:2023cv09903
Plaintiff:
Patrick Lee Jones
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security and Kikolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04869
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Campos et al
as 1:2023cv00246
Plaintiff:
Patrick Bernard Jones
Defendant:
Jeff Campos, Tracy Harker, Trever Friend and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Adams
as 1:2023cv00225
Plaintiff:
Patrick Bernard Jones
Defendant:
Ashlynn Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Patrick Jones v. David Ramos, et al
as 23-11823
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PATRICK DWYON JONES
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID RAMOS, RODGER BERLYNE, PATRIENA SENITA ALLEN and others
Jones v. Ramos et al
as 5:2022cv00482
Plaintiff:
Patrick Dwyon Jones
Defendant:
David Ramos, FNU Berlyne, Patriena Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Emanger GilbertIn re: Emanger Gilbert
as 22-11587
Petitioner:
In re: EMANGER L. GILBERT
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA, JOSEPH H. HEADLEY, Warden III, JIMMY K. MOULTON, Cir. Judge and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
