Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 76
Ueon Bak v. Patrick Donahoe
as 22-55423
Plaintiff / Appellant: UEON C. BAK
Defendant / Appellee: PATRICK DONAHOE, Postmaster General
Gonzalez v. City of Shelbyville et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv00653
Defendant: Officer Nick Fiscante, Officer William White, Officer Darvin Chesser and others
Plaintiff: Enrique Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00588
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rosemary Garity v. USDC-NVL
as 17-72805
: In re: ROSEMARY GARITY
Petitioner: ROSEMARY GARITY
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA, LAS VEGAS
Real Party In Interest: PATRICK DONAHOE, USPS PMG and MEGAN J. BRENNAN, USPS PMG
Ueon Bak v. Patrick Donahoe, et al
as 17-56511
Plaintiff - Appellant: UEON BAK
Defendant - Appellee: PATRICK DONAHOE and UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Ueon Bak v. Patrick R. Donahoe et al
as 8:2017cv01102
Plaintiff: Ueon Bak
Defendant: Patrick Donahoe and Postmaster General
Bonidy, et al v. USPS, et al
as 13-1374
Amicus Curiae: BRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE
Defendant / Appellant: PATRICK DONAHOE, Postmaster General, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and MICHAEL KERVIN, Acting Postmaster, Avon, Colorado
Plaintiff / Appellee: TAB BONIDY and NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR GUN RIGHTS
Morrow v. Donahoe
as 1:2015cv06906
Plaintiff: Nancy Morrow
Defendant: Patrick Donahoe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawthorne v. Donahoe et al
as 1:2015cv01998
Plaintiff: Regina Hawthorne
Defendant: Patrick Donahoe, Postmater General and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv01118
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?