Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Cristian Pascal, et al v. Nissan North America, Inc.
as 23-80021
Petitioner:
CRISTIAN PASCAL, MARIA MENGONI, TINISHA MILLER and others
Respondent:
NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC., a California Corporation
Shiyang Huang, et al v. Mondelez International, Inc.
as 22-55475
Plaintiff / Appellee:
PATRICK MCMORROW, MARCO OHLIN and MELODY DIGREGORIO, on behalf of themselves, all others similarly situated, and the general public
Appellant:
SHIYANG HUANG
Defendant / Appellee:
MONDELEZ INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Patrick McMorrow, et al v. Mondelez International, Inc.
as 21-80019
Respondent:
MARCO OHLIN, MELODY DIGREGORIO, on behalf of themselves, all others similarly situated, and the general public and PATRICK MCMORROW
Petitioner:
MONDELEZ INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Cristian Pascal et al v. Nissan North America, Inc.
as 8:2020cv00492
Defendant:
NISSAN MOTOR CO., LTD., a Foreign Corporation, DOES 1 through 10, inclusive,, NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC., a California Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTIAN PASCAL, MARIA MENGONI, on behalf of themselves and all others, Maria Mengoni and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
McMorrow et al v. Mondelez International, Inc.
as 3:2017cv02327
Plaintiff:
Patrick McMorrow and Marco Ohlin
Defendant:
Mondelez International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McMorrow v. Stephens
as 5:2011ct03207
Plaintiff:
Patrick McMorrow
Defendant:
Ms. Stephens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patrick McMorrow v. Unknown Party
as 09-17155
Petitioner - Appellant:
PATRICK MCMORROW
Respondent - Appellee:
UNKNOWN PARTY
McMorrow v. Unknown Party
as 4:2009cv00450
Petitioner:
Patrick McMorrow
Respondent:
Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
McMorrow v. Apker et al
as 4:2008cv00627
Plaintiff:
Patrick McMorrow
Defendant:
Craig Apker, Beckworth, Hollenbeck and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
