Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Nolan et al v. Wetzel et al
as 2:2023cv00895
Plaintiff:
Kathryn L. Nolan and Ann Vosburg
Defendant:
Richard D. Wetzel, Kathy Smedley, Paul John and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PS) Spearman v. Towing et al
as 2:2021cv01288
Defendant:
Jill N. Wood, Hanna Boyce, Victoria Chavez and others
Plaintiff:
Reginald Edward Spearman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOVIND et al v. CANNON
as 3:2020cv05708
Plaintiff:
CREATION SCIENCE EVANGELISM MINISTRY, KENT E HOVIND and PAUL JOHN HANSEN
Defendant:
HOPE THAI CANNON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOVIND v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2020cv05484
Plaintiff:
KENT E HOVIND and PAUL JOHN HANSEN
Defendant:
MICHELLE HELDMYER, ALAN STUART RICHEY, SCOTT SCHNEIDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dhermy v. Cobb et al
as 2:2017cv02327
Plaintiff:
Paul John Dhermy
Defendant:
Jason L Cobb and City of Mattoon Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dhermy v. Cobb et al
as 2:2017cv02317
Plaintiff:
Paul John Dhermy
Defendant:
Jason L Cobb and City of Mattoon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
James Linlor v. India Mitchell
as 17-2203
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES LINLOR
Defendant - Appellee:
INDIA WILEA MITCHELL, in her individual capacity, PAUL JOHN SOLO, in his individual capacity and METROPOLITAN WASHINGTON AIRPORTS AUTHORITY, (MWAA)
Linlor v. Mitchell et al
as 1:2017cv00723
Plaintiff:
James Linlor
Defendant:
India Wilea Mitchell , Paul John Solo and Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dhermy v. Doe et al
as 2:2014cv02259
Plaintiff:
Paul John Dhermy
Defendant:
John Doe, I, Jeff Branson , Timothy Glover and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Berlanga et al v. Berlanga et al
as 3:2012cv00402
Plaintiff:
Pablo Berlanga and Phyllis Berlanga
Defendant:
Florinda Berlanga, Arturo Berlanga, Connie Berlanga and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
