Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Bobby Morgan v. USPC, et al
as 16-5081
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Bobby D. Morgan
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Parole Commission and Paul R.A. Howard, Hearing Examiner
MORGAN v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2014cv00770
Plaintiff:
BOBBY D. MORGAN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION and PAUL R.A. HOWARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Darrell Parks v. Isaac Fulwood, Jr., et al
as 12-57181
Petitioner - Appellant:
DARRELL JAMES PARKS
Respondent - Appellee:
ISAAC FULWOOD, Jr., Chairman, United States Parole Commission, PAUL R.A. HOWARD, Examiner, United States Parole Commission, FRANCISCO J. QUINTANA, Victorville-Federal Correctional Complex and others
Darrell Parks v. USDC-CALA
as 12-72120
:
In re: DARRELL JAMES PARKS
Petitioner:
DARRELL JAMES PARKS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Real Party In Interest:
ISAAC FULWOOD, Jr., PATRICIA K. CUSHWA and PAUL R.A. HOWARD, Examiner, United States Parole Commission
James Owens-El v. Steven Brunson
as 12-1183
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES JOSEPH OWENS
Defendant - Appellee:
STEVEN BRUNSON, MARY JO WILLIAMS, NATALIE VALLANDINGHAM and others
Owens-El v. Brunson et al
as 1:2011cv00523
Plaintiff:
James Joseph Owens-El
Defendant:
Steven Brunson , Mary Jo Williams , Natalie Vallandingham and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Collier v. Dreher, et al.
as 1:2011cv00270
Plaintiff:
William H. Collier, Jr.
Defendant:
J. Dreher , H.A. Rios , Paul R.A. Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Darrell James Parks v. Isaac Fulwood et al
as 2:2010cv09332
Respondent:
Patricia K. Cushwa, Isaac Fulwood, Jr., Paul R.A. Howard and others
Petitioner:
Darrell James Parks
FISHER v. FULWOOD et al
as 1:2009cv01910
Plaintiff:
RICHARD FISHER
Defendant:
ISAAC FULWOOD, JR., PATRICIA CUSHWA, P. DENTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
