Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Winningham v. Baker et al
as 2:2017cv00170
Plaintiff:
Glenn Winningham
Defendant:
Donald Baker, Donald B Verilli, Jr., Erik Fossum and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Winningham v. United States, Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv00993
Plaintiff:
Glenn Winningham
Defendant:
United States, Inc., United States District Court For The Northern District of Texas, Inc., United States District Court For The District Of Arizona, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ruston v. United States of America et al
as 3:2012cv04813
Plaintiff:
Lester Jon Ruston
Defendant:
United States of America, Sidney Fitzwater, Paul Stickney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
USA, et al v. Caremark, Inc, et al
as 5:2012cv00929
Neutral:
Karl Bayer and Paul Stickney
Special Master:
Karl Bayer
Intervenor Defendant:
Caremark Inc. and Caremark RX, Inc.
Defendant:
Caremark International Holdings, Inc., Caremark International, Inc., Caremark RX, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
District of Columbia, Janaki Ramados, State of Delaware and others
Movant:
Health Care of Delaware, Inc., HealthAssurance of Pennsylvania, McKesson Corporation and others
Notice Only Party:
KPMG LLP, Medco Health Solutions, Inc., Public Consulting Group, Inc. and others
919)571-4837 (fax:
State of North Carolina
Intervenor Plaintiff:
The State of California, United States Of America, the State of Arkansas and others
Unknown:
Nicholas Bagley, Meredith Lynn Burrell and Jeanette L. Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Odeh v. Orwig, et al
as 07-11179
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OSAMA ODEH, also known as Sam
Defendant - Appellee:
MATTHEW ORWIG, in personal capacity, RICHARD ROPER, in personal capacity, THOMAS GIBSON, in personal capacity and others
Odeh et al v. Orwig et al
as 4:2007cv00270
Plaintiff:
Ali Odeh and Osama 'Sam' Odeh
Defendant:
Matthew Orwig, Richard Roper, Thomas Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
