Cases 1 - 10 of 294
(PC) Spengler v. CDCR et al
as 2:2024cv01573
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, PayPal, Inc., Customers Bank and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Patrick Spengler, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00868
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
PayPal, Inc. v. CFPB, et al
as 24-5146
Defendant:
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and Rohit Chopra, in his official capacity as Director, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
Plaintiff:
PayPal, Inc.
Patent Armory Inc. v. Paypal Inc.
as 6:2024cv00183
Plaintiff:
Patent Armory Inc.
Defendant:
Paypal Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
eCardless Bancorp, Ltd. v. PayPal Holdings, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv01054
Plaintiff:
eCardless Bancorp, Ltd.
Defendant:
PayPal Holdings, Inc and PayPal Inc
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Franklin v. Wells Fargo et al
as 8:2024cv00520
Plaintiff:
Michael Franklin
Defendant:
Wells Fargo, PayPal, Western Union and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 Electronic Fund Transfer Act (EFTA)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00851
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Internet Payments Patents Ltd. v. PayPal, Inc.
as 6:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
Internet Payments Patents Ltd.
Defendant:
PayPal, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00408
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Sabol et al v. PayPal Holdings, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv05100
Plaintiff:
Christian Sabol and Samanthia Russell
Defendant:
PayPal Holdings, Inc. and PayPal, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
