Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv00817
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Garcia et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv10033
Plaintiff:
Mirna Garcia and Pedro Alvarez
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Alvarez-Sanchez v. USA
as 2:2013cv02145
Petitioner:
Pedro Alvarez-Sanchez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Acosta-Ramirez et al v. Banco Popular de Puerto Rico et al
as 3:2013cv01774
Plaintiff:
Eladio Acosta-Ramirez , Victor A Alvarez-Valentin , Luis M Albino-Irizarry and others
Defendant:
Banco Popular de Puerto Rico
Intervenor_defendant:
FDIC
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
USA v. Pedro Hidalgo
as 13-12897
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
PEDRO HIDALGO, a.k.a. Pedro Hildago, a.k.a. Peter Hildalgo, a.k.a. Pedro Alvarez-Hidalgo, a.k.a. Pedro Joaquin Hidalgo-Alvarez, a.k.a. Pedro Alvarez
USA v. Pedro Alvarez-Sanchez
as 13-10224
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
PEDRO ALVAREZ-SANCHEZ, AKA Alfredo Gomez
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv01331
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor_defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jose Jesus Sanchez et al v. Oil Mop.
as 4:2011cv03037
Defendant:
Oil Mop
Plaintiff:
Jose Jesus Sanchez , Alberto Alvarez , Tito Alvarez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jose Jesus Sanchez et al v. Oil Mop
as 1:2011cv00226
Defendant:
Oil Mop
Plaintiff:
Jose Jesus Sanchez , Alberto Alvarez , Tito Alvarez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv02028
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
