Cases 41 - 50 of 80
USA v. Pedro Diaz-Calderone
as 12-12013
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
PEDRO DIAZ-CALDERONE, a.k.a. Pedro Calderone Diaz, a.k.a. Calderon Pedro, a.k.a. Pedro Diaz
Hodge v. Sidorowicz
as 12-1376
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Martin Hodge
Defendant:
Timothy Whalen, Carl J. Keoningsmann, Lester Wright and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Wladyslaw Sidorowicz, Dr., Lynn Lilley, Shron Lilley and others
Jones v. Smith
as 12-401
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Michael Jones
Defendant - Appellee:
Joseph Smith, Superintendent, Shawangunk Correctional Facility, John Maly, Superintendent, Shawangunk Correctional Facility, Pedro Diaz, Regional Health Service Administration and others
Diaz v. Pfister et al
as 1:2012cv00286
Petitioner:
Pedro Diaz
Respondent:
Randy Pfister and Attorney General State Of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pedro Diaz-Minjarez v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 11-73856
Petitioner:
PEDRO DIAZ-MINJAREZ
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. DB Research, L.L.P. et al
as 7:2011cv00377
Plaintiff:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
DB Research, L.L.P., D'Tronics, Ltd., Pedro Diaz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States v. Diaz-Martinez
as 11-6288
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
PEDRO DIAZ-MARTINEZ
Moreno v. Bank of America, NA et al
as 3:2011cv01265
Defendant:
Bank of America, NA, Mortgage Electronic Registration Services, Inc. and Recon Trust Company
Plaintiff:
Pedro Diaz Moreno
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2011cv01587
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Abbate et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2011cv03282
Plaintiff:
Gregg Abbate , Brian Adamson , Douglas Anderson and others
Defendant:
City of New York and The New York City Police Department
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
